The Promise of Medically Tailored Meals
An analysis of the effects, technological components, and philosophical meaning
To learn more about the Health Tech Happy Hour publication, click here. Otherwise, thank you for subscribing, reading, and sharing with your colleagues and friends!
For decades, Medicare and Medicaid have operated under a traditional medical model, focusing primarily on covering doctor visits, hospital stays, and prescription medications. However, as our understanding of health determinants evolves, healthcare leaders are increasingly recognizing that effective medical care extends beyond the doctor's office and into patients' daily lives—particularly their kitchens and refrigerators.
Importantly, while this expansion of medical care (e.g., drugs, surgeries, human physiology) into the larger realm of public health interventions (e.g., nutrition, behavior, exercise, social factors) is driven by research and expanded knowledge, it is also functionally facilitated by logistical and digital technologies.
The Evolution of Food as Medicine
Medically Tailored Meals (MTMs) represent a growing innovation in healthcare delivery. These aren't ordinary meal delivery services; they're precisely crafted nutritional interventions, designed by registered dietitians to address specific medical conditions. For instance, a patient with congestive heart failure might receive low-sodium meals, while someone with diabetes receives meals carefully balanced to manage blood sugar levels. These programs typically provide 10 weekly meals—lunch and dinner for five days—delivered directly to patients' homes.
Several pioneering organizations have demonstrated the potential of MTMs. The Food Is Medicine Coalition, a network of nonprofits, has been providing these services to chronically ill patients across the country. Organizations like Project Angel Heart and MANNA have shown promising results in reducing healthcare utilization among their clients. These programs often target individuals who face both medical challenges and limitations in their ability to prepare healthy meals, making them particularly vulnerable to poor health outcomes without intervention.
The Critical Technology Infrastructure Behind MTM Programs
Managing large-scale MTM programs requires sophisticated technological infrastructure spanning multiple functions. This is a core part of the reason why these programs are feasible and cost-effective. These systems need robust electronic health record (EHR) integration to receive and process patient dietary requirements, medical conditions, and delivery preferences in the case of programs where physicians prescribe the MTM program. These programs are sometimes known as produce prescription programs. In other cases, where eligibility criteria are managed by case managers at government, community-based organizations, or managed care organizations, the presence of certain risk factors or eligibility categories are sufficient to facilitate ordering without EHR integration—this is the most common form of the program. Other data sources such as claims data, self-referral, and standard referrals from clinicians are used to identify patients.
Order management systems form another critical component, coordinating meal planning, preparation, and delivery logistics. These systems must handle complex dietary restrictions, track ingredient inventories, and manage production schedules across multiple kitchen facilities. Advanced logistics algorithms help optimize delivery routes while ensuring meals maintain proper temperature and quality during transport.
Quality assurance technology plays a crucial role in maintaining food safety and regulatory compliance. Digital monitoring systems track food temperatures throughout preparation and delivery, while automated documentation systems ensure adherence to food safety protocols and dietary specifications. In most circumstances for health care services organizations, this is all invisible on the vendor side of the equation. Vendors such as Mom’s Meals and Performance Kitchen work with health plans, government organizations, and health systems to operate these programs (this is not an advertisement, but informational).
Mobile applications and patient portals enable real-time communication with recipients, allowing them to provide feedback, modify preferences, and confirm deliveries. These platforms often incorporate educational content about nutrition and disease management, extending the program's impact beyond meal delivery. For patients receiving MTM through care or case management, these programs can be incorporated into care coordination, medication therapy management (the other MTM), and disease management interventions.
The success of MTM programs also increasingly depends on data analytics capabilities that can demonstrate program effectiveness and cost savings to insurers and healthcare systems. These platforms must track key performance indicators, from delivery metrics to health outcomes, while integrating with broader healthcare analytics systems to measure impact on hospitalization rates and medical costs.
If this type of intervention becomes institutionalized as a core benefit through the medical care system, then we will likely see increased use of *everybody’s favorite topic of conversation right now* machine learning and AI technologies to facilitate operations and clinical effectiveness.
AI-powered systems can:
Predict patient needs based on medical histories and social determinants of health
Optimize meal plans for both nutritional requirements and cost efficiency
Forecast ingredient demands and reduce food waste
Identify patients most likely to benefit from MTM interventions
Side note: if anyone reading this article has an example of ML-based patient risk stratification programs than then roll into an MTM intervention, please leave a comment or reach out. This is my dream.
The Economic Case for Food as Medicine and MTM
A groundbreaking study published in JAMA Network Open in 2022 provides compelling evidence for the economic value of MTMs. The research, examining over 6 million eligible adults with diet-sensitive conditions and daily living limitations, found that national implementation (across all payor types) of MTMs could potentially prevent approximately 1.6 million hospitalizations annually and generate net cost savings of $13.6 billion in the first year alone.
The economics become even more compelling over time. The study projects that over ten years, MTM programs could result in net savings of $185.1 billion across public and private insurance programs. This includes the full costs of screening patients, preparing meals, and delivering them—making it a remarkably cost-effective intervention. The study found that most of these savings (77%) would occur in Medicare and Medicaid, suggesting that public insurance programs have the most to gain from implementing MTM coverage. CMS has allowed Medicare Advantage plans to explore MTMs as a supplemental benefit, but has not been authorized by congress to make it a permanent benefit as a part of Medicare or Medicaid programs. States have used a mechanism called the Section 1115 waiver to experiment with these programs.
The Political and Philosophical Dilemma with MTM
Yet, these promising results raise a fundamental question: Should insurance companies or government programs be in the business of providing food? It's a question that challenges our traditional boundaries between medical care and daily living expenses. It also evokes the common political tension between individual and local community responsibility vs. government provision of services. However, the primary driver of “benefits addition” to major federal health programs is cost. It is difficult and often not permissible for the Congressional Budget Office to take cost-avoidance into account from new benefits in Medicare or Medicaid.
However, we already have precedents for government food assistance. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) have long provided food support to millions of Americans. However, these programs are viewed as social safety net initiatives, not medical interventions. They serve a different purpose and population than MTMs, which are specifically designed as medical interventions for people with serious health conditions. Interestingly, the "medicalization” of these interventions may make them more palatable for those who oppose significant social safety net programs.
The MTM debate forces us to confront complex questions about institutional responsibilities and the scope of healthcare services. How much of daily life should be funded by external institutions rather than individuals? Where do we draw the line between medical care and basic needs? These questions become particularly relevant as we better understand the social determinants of health and their impact on medical outcomes. However, given the significant costs associated with hospitalization, emergency care, and chronic conditions, as a practical matter, it may behoove us to lean into any intervention that can produce downstream cost avoidance.
The Practical Resolution
Perhaps the most compelling argument for MTMs isn't philosophical but practical. If we're already spending billions on treating preventable complications of chronic diseases, and we can demonstrate that providing medically tailored meals reduces those expenses while improving health outcomes, then the distinction between "medical care" and "food" becomes less relevant.
The JAMA study suggests that for every dollar spent on MTMs, the healthcare system saves significantly more in prevented hospitalizations and reduced complications. The research shows that even when targeting a smaller population—those with specific conditions like diabetes or heart failure—the program remains cost-effective. For example, among patients with diabetes alone, MTMs could prevent 701,000 hospitalizations annually and save $10.9 billion in yearly healthcare costs.
Looking Forward
As healthcare continues to evolve toward more preventive and whole-person care approaches, the success of MTM programs challenges us to reconsider our traditional boundaries of medical care. While philosophical debates about the role of healthcare institutions in daily life will continue, the practical benefits of MTMs are becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.
Several states are already piloting expanded MTM access, including a $6 million pilot in California for heart failure patients and a $149 million program in Massachusetts covering nutrition and housing programs. These initiatives suggest growing recognition of food's role in medical treatment and disease prevention.
The evidence suggests that sometimes, the most effective medicine might not come in a pill bottle—it might come on a plate, carefully tailored to heal and sustain those who need it most. As we continue to grapple with rising healthcare costs and chronic disease management, medically tailored meals offer a promising path forward, bridging the gap between traditional medical care and the fundamental requirements for health and healing.